<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the subject of photography&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benadamson.co.uk/2008/04/11/on-the-subject-of-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benadamson.co.uk/2008/04/11/on-the-subject-of-photography/</link>
	<description>a frightning mix of tech, life and food</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://benadamson.co.uk/2008/04/11/on-the-subject-of-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benadamson.co.uk/?p=8#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Yeah the 400D can be had for much much less than the 450D but the lens that comes with it isn&#039;t very good, unlike the new and improved one on the 450D with image stabilisation and much improved image quality. But you could buy the body only and get a lens off of ebay as you say.

@Mike - But if you&#039;re only using the lens that comes with the camera you&#039;re going to be stuck with poor low light non-flash photos with the small aperture (f/3.5 I think) and if you want to take a photo of something in the distance you&#039;re stuck with a max of 55 mm of focal length... I suppose you could zoom with your feet. Unless you&#039;re photographing a tiger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the 400D can be had for much much less than the 450D but the lens that comes with it isn&#8217;t very good, unlike the new and improved one on the 450D with image stabilisation and much improved image quality. But you could buy the body only and get a lens off of ebay as you say.</p>
<p>@Mike &#8211; But if you&#8217;re only using the lens that comes with the camera you&#8217;re going to be stuck with poor low light non-flash photos with the small aperture (f/3.5 I think) and if you want to take a photo of something in the distance you&#8217;re stuck with a max of 55 mm of focal length&#8230; I suppose you could zoom with your feet. Unless you&#8217;re photographing a tiger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://benadamson.co.uk/2008/04/11/on-the-subject-of-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benadamson.co.uk/?p=8#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking into getting a 450D ... but I think it&#039;s just waay too expensive at the moment.  I&#039;d happily settle for a 400 or 350 series, and get an awesome lens off amazon or ebay or something.

However the 450D does make me drool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking into getting a 450D &#8230; but I think it&#8217;s just waay too expensive at the moment.  I&#8217;d happily settle for a 400 or 350 series, and get an awesome lens off amazon or ebay or something.</p>
<p>However the 450D does make me drool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://benadamson.co.uk/2008/04/11/on-the-subject-of-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benadamson.co.uk/?p=8#comment-7</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need all those lenses unless you&#039;re actually going to use them... the standard canon lense is very good. Btw canon have packages that include different types of lenses, bags, tripods, and tickets for the spice girls... The camera is only as good as the ben behind it, if you know what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need all those lenses unless you&#8217;re actually going to use them&#8230; the standard canon lense is very good. Btw canon have packages that include different types of lenses, bags, tripods, and tickets for the spice girls&#8230; The camera is only as good as the ben behind it, if you know what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
